When and if divorce mediation results in agreement or settlement, the mediator has the power to make it legally binding. In the case of family law, divorce mediation, there are issues, below which you should consider.
* If our lawyers are settlement mentality, why see a mediator?
* Does not compromise just another form of dual representation?
* Can mediation help vindictive and uncooperative pairs?
* How mediators justify their fees?
* How can they help if mediators should not give legal advice?
If both lawyers are settlement mentality, why should we spend money for one more professional and hire a mediator?
If the lawyers can work together and resolve the issue quickly, amicably, and inexpensively, perhaps disclosure is not required. Quite often, a spokesman for causing the lawyer to act aggressively or begin to see strikes another person considers threatening. It is difficult for a lawyer to take care of customers and meditation play a role at the same time. Also, when lawyers do most of the negotiating, not the parties do not send directly to make their own agreement, which can also improve their communication down the road. Using a mediator could be like taking out insurance to maintain amicable situation among all the parties and consulting. It also ensures the family benefit of training innovative problem-solving. Finally, it has been suggested that the use of mediation can be a transformative experience that can really improve relations and family life instead of just putting a bandage on the settlement of family interference.
Is not mediation just another form of dual representation, with all the limitations that such conditions conflict bear?
It is true that preventive mediations involved in marriage contracts, approved and put together a family, the role of the mediator is to assemble and build harmonious relationship seems very much like the dual representation (Chapter 2.2 of the Model Code of Professional Responsibility) . Unless there is a written waiver from all parties, one lawyer must withdraw from representing two clients when conflicts appear irreconcilable. Conflict, real or apparent, are usually present in almost all dual represented at situations.
As a neutral third party, the mediator represents neither party. This may be clearer in the role of the mediator is a dispute resolver and practitioners, it is preventive mediation. The new model of conduct for mediators promulgated by the ABA, American Arbitration Association and Society for Professionals in Dispute urges all parties in mediation to provide independent advice. In many mediations lawyer attend court with their clients and participate in the mediation table.
Copyright 2008 gottrouble.com